AIR: Overview

Image: A magnifying glass hovers over a page of unidentified text.Argument in Reading

Introduction

The Argument in Reading module continues to focus on the elements that make up argumentation. Unlike the Argument in Writing module, however, you will look to other writers and how they have utilized different types of argument in their own writing. You will learn about two formal methods many use to develop an argument: the Toulmin model and the Rogerian model; furthermore, you will see how claims, evidence, and warrants work together in each of these models. Finally, you will take a deep dive into the multiple-choice section of the AP English Language and Composition Exam.

Module Objectives

  • Identify the different ways to formally organize an argument
  • Analyze the claims, lines of reasoning, and evidence of written arguments
  • Demonstrate understanding of the multiple-choice section on the AP English Language and Composition Exam

Module Lessons Preview

Claims, Evidence, and Warrants – a lesson on how claims, evidence, and warrants work together to create a strong argument

The Toulmin Argument – a lesson on the Toulmin method of argumentation

The Rogerian Argument – a lesson on the Rogerian method of argumentation

The AP English Language Exam: Multiple Choice Section – a lesson on the set-up and content of the Multiple Choice component of the AP English Language and Composition Exam

Key Terms

  • The Toulmin Argument: a style of argumentation that breaks arguments down into six component parts: claim, grounds, warrant, qualifier, rebuttal, and backing
  • The Rogerian Argument:  a style of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals

[CC BY 4.0] UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED | IMAGES: LICENSED AND USED ACCORDING TO TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION